I will create three separate posts for the digipak, website and music video.
I will create two fotobabble projects for both the digipak and the website, as the analysis is not as lengthy as the analysis of the music video. Also, considering the digipak and website are ancillary texts, it would be logical to spend most of the analysis on the primary product.
I have chosen to use the format of prezi to present the conventions of how to compare my media product with the genre conventions of an alternative hip-hop music video. Also, I can makes the point of comparison for the website and digipak, by uploading images that market to the same/similar target audience. It will enable to create a genre shopping list and see how our product has used the products in a visual format that isn't burdened by text and is interactive.
The benefit of using prezi, means I can collate a variety of different media products in a digestible format, by dividing and organising certain aspects of alternative hip-hop music videos into categories. I can then use collected information to analyse what the benefits of what I concluded in my media product and also what conventions I may have used/challenged to construct a stronger media products.
It also has minimal text but remains high in impact: it piques audience interest by providing essential information and leaves the audience to learn more about the company/product etc. It also prevents them from being bored and scrambling through text to extract important information.
Finally, it can be shared easily which can be advantageous as it can be accessed on various social media platforms, therefore update customers/fans on product progress.
I will also use screencast-o-matic to document qualitative analysis. I will be able to show audience's response to the video visually, and it also allows viewers to pick up on nuances that cannot be conveyed through transcription, such as facial expressions. It will allow us to change and adapt our product to the audience's demands.
In the conclusion, I will write a summative paragraph, detailing important information collected from the screencast-o-matic. I will also state how I would improve the product, had I the opportunity to do the product again.
2. How effective is the combination of your main product and ancillary texts?
By using a voki, I can clearly explain what aspects of the media were well constructed technically and how it impacted viewing experience.
3. What have you learned from your audience feedback?
I will use an infographic to accurately record quantitative analysis, provided by audience feedback. It presents a unique and effective form of visually representing data.
It also has minimal text but remains high in impact: it piques audience interest by providing essential information and leaves the audience to learn more about the company/product etc. It also prevents them from being bored and scrambling through text to extract important information.
Finally, it can be shared easily which can be advantageous as it can be accessed on various social media platforms, therefore update customers/fans on product progress.
I will also use screencast-o-matic to document qualitative analysis. I will be able to show audience's response to the video visually, and it also allows viewers to pick up on nuances that cannot be conveyed through transcription, such as facial expressions. It will allow us to change and adapt our product to the audience's demands.
In the conclusion, I will write a summative paragraph, detailing important information collected from the screencast-o-matic. I will also state how I would improve the product, had I the opportunity to do the product again.
4. How did you use media technologies in the construction and research, planning and evaluation stages?
I will create a slideshow documenting what technologies were used in each stage of product construction and analyse why each technological product was most suitable to present information, be creative ideas/inspiration or socio-economic research.
No comments:
Post a Comment